@';Would it be interesting if we could prove that Jesus had a family and add this long lost information to the book of facts.';
We must accept what is written and add nothing to it.
Look at the cross. When Jesus told the disciple John to take care of his mother...why did not he speak to magdalene then?
He did not have to.
Their relationship was not like that.
Jesus' soul purpose was to be born and to minister God's Word and die for the salvation to us and resurrect back to His Father.
Not set-up house.Why does the church kept secret of the relationship of Jesus and Mary Magdalene%26lt;if true%26gt;?
Nice answer sun, now my answer goes to maddy who sure behaves like one.No it would not deny him of his divinity, but Jesus was a Nazarene, %26amp; these people were not to be married some other examples include Samson,John the Baptist etc.
Report Abuse
Look at your own book and how your prophet treated women and because of which how your religion treats women and calls them aurat and deficit in intelligence.
Report Abuse
The relationship is stated in the Bible - and it's not one of marriage.
I hate to be the one to break this news to you, but you're not a Christian - a Christian understands the difference between God and man and you, unfortunately, don't. I suggest you look in the yellow pages under Churches - Interdenominational and call to make an appointment with the Youth Pastor, of any church listed, who will be pleased to talk with you about Christian Biblical beliefs.
That whole ordeal is something people read into in the painting of the last supper. That painting isn't even accurate, because in a Seder meal, the guests would be reclining on the floor all the way around the table, not sitting there on one half.
That myth is one hundred percent bogus, just an idea stretched from a man-made painting that isn't even accurate.
Perhaps their was a marriage, perhaps there was not. Christ is our savior either way and it doesn't change anything.
Ever noticed how much people swear by using either God's name or Christ's name? Perhaps it was to protect her name from such abuse.
If I were to guess, I bet they were married. She was the first one at the tomb and the one who he appeared to first. It seems logical that he'd appear to the one he loved most first. It also seems logical that she would be at the tomb when others would not.
He is our Lord and our Savior irregardless of his marital status.
What I find funny is that had Jesus gotten married and had a family that would not have been something to cover up. There is nothing sinful or wrong with getting married and/ or having children. Jesus could have gotten married and fathered children and still been sinless. Goodness Jesus could have shown an example of a very good marriage, what a prefect husband to be married to the Lord Jesus. That would be a marriage people would want to model. It is doubtfully that Jesus would have had time for a wife and children. He died when he was only 33 and for the last 3 years of his life he was off spreading the gospel. Prior to this he was a carpenter living with his parents and half siblings. At what point Joseph died is not clear but what is clear is Jesus would have been the head of the family being the oldest son.
It's interesting conjecture, but as far as we know there's nothing to back it up. Most of these are recent ideas that came from fiction and from our very modern way of seeing the situation (';Oh, she was a chick and she hung out with a bunch of guys, she had to get busy with at least one of them.';) Really, it doesn't matter either way as far as I'm concerned. There's nothing ';dirty'; about him having a wife, so I wouldn't think that it would need to be hidden had it happened. But taking a look at that culture it's most likely that he was an ascetic.
IF the relationship were to be true:
It would take off Jesus Christ's Divinity and Godly Status and put him as a common man.
Possibly the Church concealed this story just to keep Women out of Church, Why only men are pope, not women ??
Why aren't Gospels by women not included in the Bible ?? -- The Gospel of Mary was thrown out, Women Stripped of their power and pushed into the kitchens and baby making machines.
Too bad, Constantine was a real fool
Well, if it were true, it would be because in those times, a man must lead, so giving that power to mary magdalene was a no no. And they thought that jesus ought to be holy and stuff, with no wives...just how like how the people here reacted.
And the da vinci code was based on the sea scrolls, which is like the bible(only more chances of it being unedited)
So...the Son of God procured with a shunned prostitute?
Oh, right. I read the DaVinci Code.
--Oh, wait a doggone minute now.
Jesus is God? So, God procured with a shunned prostitute?
What crap are you brainwashed into believing?
It is a blasphemous lie! It is the most ridiculous and nonsensical conspiracy ever invented. Dan Brown works for the Jews.
You've been reading too much Dan Brown. After writing that fiction, he laughed all the way to the bank.
';its not true at all..!!
why can't people understand that its just a part of fiction..nothing else!';
That's the problem with all of religion.
ita a lie....someone made that up...
It a lie ... jesus was pure and holy, if he had kids don't you think it would have been recorded.
its not true at all..!!
why can't people understand that its just a part of fiction..nothing else!!
We have very little information about Jesus outside of what is found in the scriptures. There are no stories and few traditions that survived the apostasy. The Catholic church in all likelihood doesn't know whether Christ was married.
Remember that Christianity was illegal, and its practicioners were forced to hide for over a hundred years. Things were lost. There are many scriptural references that modern Christians shake their heads at because they don't mingle well with the modern Catholic and Protestant creeds.
';Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? Why then are they baptized for the dead?'; (1 Corinthians 15:29)
';Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.'; (Acts 21:26)
';But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up stedfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God'; (Acts 7:55)
';And when Simon saw that through laying on of the apostles鈥?hands the Holy Ghost was given, he offered them money'; (Acts 8:18)
';For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.'; (1 Peter 4:6)
';Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live. '; (John 5:25)
';4 And no man taketh this honour unto himself, but he that is called of God, as was Aaron.
5 So also Christ glorified not himself to be made an high priest; but he that said unto him, Thou art my Son, to day have I begotten thee.
6 As he saith also in another place, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec. ';
(Hebrews 5)
Why were people being baptized for the dead, and why has this practice been lost? If Paul entered the temple to accomplish the days of purification, then shouldn't we? If Jesus is God, then why did Stephen see him standing next to God? If the Holy Ghost is given by the laying on of hands, then why is this ordinance not practiced in the Catholic and Protestant churches? When was the gospel preached to those who are dead? When did they hear the voice of the son of God and live? Why did Christ need the authority of Melchisedec? What are the duties and functions of a High Priest in this order?
I believe much was lost.
So that 2000 years later when the religion was running out of steam they could write a book and make a movie out of it to fund their dying propaganda machine. How's that for divine foresight?
Jesus = God. And no-one likes to think that God was cheating on Mary the first
No comments:
Post a Comment